Ep 653 · 15 min · Fri 14 Aug 2026

How to Find Your Unicorn Ads

You can't pick the winning ad before it runs, so stop trying. One of Australia's best Meta advertisers made 15,000 ads to find fewer than 10 that truly flew.

Play episode 653
0:00 15 min

In this episode

Making a single ad used to cost anywhere from half a million to a few million dollars. You’d pour everything into one big idea, one hero execution, and you had to be right, because that was the bet. The whole model was built on getting it perfect before it ever went live.

That world is gone. Today a brand can make a few hundred ads off an iPhone, put a bit of spend behind each, and let the market tell them which one works. And here’s the shift worth sitting with: this isn’t just about you being braver with creative. It’s about how your whole team works, how you approve things, how much you trust the data, and letting go of the idea that any single ad is your whole brand. On Meta, a piece of content is disposable. It’s not the masthead, it’s a test.

Not many people live that better than Mark Broadhead, Head of Creative and Growth at The Lad Collective, the Queensland bedding brand you’ve almost certainly been served on Meta. He’s made around 15,000 ads in four years, and he’s the engine behind the brand growing to 200,000 customers and launching into the US.


The Maths That Reframes Everything

Mark did some research on his own account and the numbers are startling. Around 15,000 ads in four years, and fewer than 10 genuine “unicorns”, the ads that don’t just work but scale like crazy.

Your strike rate is not high. We’ve probably had less than ten that really, really scale, that just go nuts. These are the type of ads you put in and you couldn’t believe the results.

  • Mark Broadhead, Head of Creative and Growth, The Lad Collective

His biggest ever winner came from realising that thread count is basically a myth, and that nobody had ever said so. The team shot a whole ad in a shopping centre de-mything thread count, and for the first 45 seconds never mentioned the product. His logic: if you can find something everyone believes is true and then derail it, that’s the biggest hook there is, and if you can get someone 45 seconds in without them knowing why they’re watching, that’s where the gold is. He also refuses to gatekeep. Anyone gives him anything, there’s a 99.9% chance it goes in the account, with almost no feedback, because he genuinely doesn’t know what will work. That sounds like chaos, but underneath it is a disciplined system, and it’s a team sport more than a solo one.


Lesson One: Take More Shots, and Protect the Ones You’re Testing

Start with the maths, because it reframes everything. If one of the country’s best Meta advertisers misses most of the time, you and I have no chance of picking the winner up front, and the only lever left is how many chances you give yourself to find one. For years we’ve been taught good marketing is selective and precise. But volume isn’t laziness anymore, it’s a strategy, whether you like it or not.

There’s a trap sitting right next to it. Pour all your budget into the ads already winning and the algorithm never finds the next one, because it just keeps feeding what it knows. So you have to ring-fence budget for new, unproven creative and keep it separate from your winners. Scratch Pet Food‘s co-founder Mike Halligan built his whole growth engine around exactly that.

We get about sixty to seventy percent of our sales from creative launched in the last two or three months, through having new creative in separate campaigns from the winning creative, so it’s not influenced by the bias it has towards data it knows.

  • Mike Halligan, Co-founder, Scratch Pet Food

His biggest risk isn’t wasting money on tests, it’s accidentally overspending because too many are working at once. That’s the position you want to be in, and you only get there by constantly feeding in new creative and protecting it from your winners. So carve out a testing budget that’s ring-fenced, and judge it on whether it’s finding your next unicorn, not on today’s return.


Lesson Two: Change Your Approvals, Not Just Your Attitude

This one usually gets talked about as “get your ego out of the way,” and that’s part of it, but it’s bigger than one person being humble. It’s about your process. Who signs off on creative, how many people have to say yes, how tightly you cling to the brand book. Every one of those approval steps is a place where a future unicorn gets killed because it looked wrong to someone in a meeting.

The fix is to change the system so the default is that things go live and the data decides. Set one real guardrail, that an ad can’t be inaccurate or misleading, and inside that line, let it run. Ovira‘s founder Alice Williams, who made it one of the most-followed Australian brands on TikTok, is blunt on this.

Ignore your account managers when they say simplify your campaigns. If it’s making us money, we don’t care. Make it look like organic content, then introduce the product so the consumer doesn’t realise they’re watching an ad. Throw out your brand guidelines.

  • Alice Williams, Founder, Ovira

That’s not a licence to be sloppy or to say anything you like, it’s a licence to stop pre-judging on taste. Don’t hang on to your brand book so tightly that you strangle the test. Loosen the approvals, keep the one guardrail that it’s honest to the customer, and let the market do the vetoing.


Lesson Three: Give Your Long Shots Their Own Budget

This is where your volume and the algorithm collide. Left alone, Meta pours money into whatever is converting right now, which is usually your one big winner. That’s fine until it starves everything else, and the next unicorn is often hiding in a product or an idea the machine would never choose to bet on. So you have to step outside the algorithm and give your long shots their own budget to find an audience. Dave Dullens, who runs the ad account across a big product range at Conquest Sports, put it well.

You can’t rely on the algorithm to surface the most commercial. Brands don’t sell one product, they sell hundreds, and some things need to find an audience to establish. It understands conversion, it doesn’t understand the brand priorities.

  • Dave Dullens, Conquest Sports

The algorithm optimises for the next sale. You’re trying to find the next unicorn. Those are not the same job. So ring-fence a little spend for the products and ideas you actually want to grow, give them a proper run of their own, and feed the winners back into your main engine once they’ve earned it.


The Takeaway

Finding a breakout ad isn’t a talent, it’s a numbers game played with a bit of humility, and it’s a team sport more than a solo one. Take more shots, protect the new ones from your proven winners, loosen the approvals so the data decides instead of a person, and give your long shots a real budget. Then let go of the idea that any single ad is your whole brand, because on Meta, most of them are disposable. The unicorn is sitting somewhere in your next hundred ads. You just have to publish enough of them to meet it, and be humble enough not to kill it on the way.


Frequently Asked Questions

What is a “unicorn ad”? It’s a breakout ad that doesn’t just perform but scales dramatically, delivering results far beyond a normal winner. They’re rare: The Lad Collective made around 15,000 ads in four years and had fewer than 10 genuine unicorns. Because you can’t reliably pick them in advance, the strategy is to run enough creative to find them.

How much of your ad budget should go to testing new creative? Enough that new creative is a meaningful share of spend, kept in separate campaigns from your proven winners so the algorithm’s bias toward known data doesn’t smother it. Scratch Pet Food gets 60 to 70% of sales from creative launched in the last two to three months, and judges testing on whether it’s finding the next winner rather than on immediate return.

Why shouldn’t you put all your budget behind your best-performing ad? Because the algorithm will keep feeding your current winner and never discover the next one. Concentrating spend on proven ads starves new creative of the chance to find an audience, so you have to ring-fence budget for unproven ads and for the products you want to grow.

How do you stop good ad ideas dying in approvals? Change the system so the default is that ads go live and the data decides, rather than requiring sign-off from people who pre-judge on taste. Set one guardrail, that the ad must be accurate and not misleading, and let everything inside that line run. Tight brand-book gatekeeping is where future winners get killed.

In this Playbook we cover three things ecommerce operators can take into their business:

  • Take more shots, and ring-fence the ones you’re testing from your proven winners
  • Change your approvals, not just your attitude, so the data decides instead of a person
  • Give your long shots their own budget, because the algorithm won’t bet on them for you

Read the full transcript Auto-generated

Nathan Bush: Foreign.

Nathan Bush: There's a link in E commerce that mostly goes unsaid and it's a slightly awkward one. It's the connection between giving and commercial benefit. When a brand partners with a charity, they're almost always doing it for the right reason, because they want to do some good. But to get it off the ground and to keep it alive, especially when the budget's tighten, they usually have to rationalize it in commercial terms. And that's the part that often feels a bit icky to say out loud that generosity also carries a commercial upside. It does though. And being honest about this is often the very thing that, that lets the good happen at all. I reckon a lot of charities miss out right here because they don't like playing in this commercial space. It feels a bit grubby to them. The thing worth chasing though is a win, win, win. A win for the retailer, a win for the charity and a win for the community in need. Get all three wins right and it's hugely powerful. Miss one. And these programs often fall over. I've known Rowan McCloskey for a long time, since he was first bringing this idea to life. Rowan founded Go Generosity, which is a pay it forward platform that turns small customer donations at the checkout into full value gift cards for people in need. He's since sold the business. But the thing that always stuck with me about what Rowan built from day one, the front of his mind wasn't just how do I amplify giving or doing good, it was how do I also amplify the return for the retailer while doing good without ever asking the retailer to give something away themselves. That balance is the bit that most people and most charities never crack. I recorded this one with the brilliant Rosa Willis, so you'll hear her in here too. Let's hear it directly from Rohan.

Rosa Willis: So commercially, like the 101, the model of go generosity where just think of the donations that are turned into gift cards, it's a no brainer for business, right? So 100%, let's just say $5,000 comes through in the form of donations in any particular month. 100% of that is turned into a full value gift card which is sent to the charity. Charity redeems at full retail value. So we've just now we don't try and say that hey, we're going to increase your revenue by 50% or 60%. Like we're really clear that we're a business that is focusing on social impact, but what we're not doing, and this is very different to social impact is we're not taking away from your margin. We're not touch, affecting or hurting your bottom line. If anything, we're helping increase it because of just simply, hey, we brought an extra 5. Like everything we do is completely measurable for the merchant. And, and they're seeing the generosity that comes in. The other thing that's like really important and probably even just started with this first, but the consumers being generous. So some questions we have been asked is, well, do I have to match the donation dollar for dollar if the consumer is giving? This is. It doesn't look like we're just passing the buck, you know, like, what is it that we have to do? I think one thing that's really important is go generosity. Although we're selling a product to the business, we're selling the product to the business because we see the traffic of the consumer orders and because we know people are going to be generous. There is so many statistics out there now to show that consumers are more likely to shop with a brand that has like a four impact purpose, like all of these things around, environmental things like that. But we know the consumers that. We've actually got data that even showed now that consumers will be like 15% of consumers will donate every single time they shop online. And there's no friction, there's no fatigue, there's none of that. But one thing that's really important is go generosity is about giving the consumer the opportunity to be generous first and foremost. And then secondly, we're also enabling the brand, they can partner with the consumer as well. So some brands, it is in their best interest to match dollar for dollar. So some of the larger brands that are on their platform, it's like, hey, it's probably a really positive message if you do match with your customer. And they always got budget for this anyway because they want to do that. Because it might not, you know, it could just be a risk if you don't, you know, in terms you want to have that positive intention. So yeah, so hopefully that answers like there's the consumer element. Consumers want to be generous. But then the commercial side of it is the fact that it gets turned into the gift cards. And then the other commercial side of it is that we did a whole bunch of mystery shopping work with Humie so you'd know Ryla from Humi and it was actually mind blowing because Marila said, hey, can I do some mystery shopping? And on, on go generosity and just like checked out want to see what consumers say about it and you know how like it's always nerve wracking. Like, even back in.

Nathan Bush: I wouldn't trust her.

Rosa Willis: And back in, back when I had restaurants, you know, it's like sometimes you're afraid to ask people, how was your meal? Because I'm like, what if they didn't really like it? I don't want to know the answer. And so when she was like, oh, feedback.

Nathan Bush: Just the good feedback.

Rosa Willis: That's right. So when she said she wants to mistress shop the whole platform and she wants to like, go all of our customers and get her mystery shoppers to do it, Yeah, I was a little bit nervous because I was like, what are people actually going to say? And I read the report, I cried when I read the report because the consumers, the mystery shoppers and what they're saying around how this, you know, going, seeing the donation, seeing that the business actually had a heart that cared for the community, that they even cared for people in need, seeing how it was so tangible because they could see where the money was going and the difference it was making. Like, statistically they were, what was it like 98% more likely to shop with that brand versus a competitor, competing brand that was selling the same products? One of the, one of the biggest questions we get asked from large brands is, do you create friction in the checkout? And then we saw that 100% of mystery shoppers were like, no friction whatsoever. If anything, it made me want to buy the product more than if they didn't have that. And so commercially, there's, there's that side of as well. I think that stacks up for merchants.

Nathan Bush: What Rowan's doing there is giving purpose a commercial backbone. He's not asking the retailer to give away anything. He's showing them the return. And that's the balance that makes the whole thing hold up. So let's go back into the archive and hear how a few brands build purpose into their offering without losing the commercial benefit. But I want to be clear about the order here because it does matter. I don't think you have to lead with the commercial case. For a lot of retailers, purpose is still the actual reason that they want to do the thing. And it's one of the strongest ways to stand out in a crowded market and take a share from your competitors. So purpose can absolutely lead, but you can't survive just on warm and fuzzies underneath it. There has to be a commercial backbone, something that makes it durable, so it isn't the first thing cut when budgets get tight. Purpose out front and a commercial engine underneath closing the gaps. Is one of the best examples of that that I know. Laura Thompson and Sarah Sheridan built the whole brand on their values, and it shows up in their numbers.

Nathan Bush: It's not just because it's good for like it is good for business. I'd say that when you lead with your values, but you've also got an opportunity as a business to do this. You're not restricted for someone who come from government funding, where the government told me what I had to talk about and when and how. And in business, we don't have any of those constraints. If you keep those values and your purpose and the why really strongly at the core of every single one of your decisions, the outcomes follow from that. Whether those outcomes are, it flows through. So we've got a returning customer rate of almost 47%. So when you've got a community of supporters, we don't call our customers customers. They're our community of supporters. We know that when we keep them as a priority, they will want to spend more time with us. They want to be involved in what we're doing. They're on the journey with us. We're on the journey with them.

Nathan Bush: A 47% return in customer rate is that commercial backbone that I was talking about. Their purpose absolutely leads in everything they talk about and everything they do, but it pays them back in loyalty and repeat purchase. So don't bury your purpose to sound commercial and don't run it on good feelings alone. Lead with the why, but make sure there's a real commercial engine underneath it. See it in the numbers. The second thing is where you place the giving. And the trick is to weave it into the problem that you're already solving for the customer, not to make them feel guilty at the worst possible moment. A donation that puts the ask on on the customer at the checkout. It just adds friction. Most people say no, and then they feel bad about it. At the moment that you're asking them to give you money, the version that works sits inside the value that you're already delivering. So the good they're doing rides along with the thing that they came to buy instead of being a guilt trip bolted on at the end. That's why Rowan's mystery shoppers felt no friction. The widget lives inside the merchant's brand, and the giving belongs to the customer rather than being squeezed or guilted out of them. James Bartle at Outland Denim worked this out very early. His fix was to lead with the product and let the story come through the product itself. They were still solving the customer's problem about delivering great jeans and great fashion, but they just made them feel good while they were at it by telling them exactly the impact they were making and the way that it was made in sustainable and ethical way.

Rosa Willis: We don't want people buying our product because it's a charity. We would have set up charity if we wanted to do that.

Nathan Bush: We want you to buy our product

Rosa Willis: if you love it. And so the product has to speak for itself. So communicating that story has. We've relied really heavily on a PR strategy for that. We've been so, so grateful to the media because they have honestly backed us in such a big way. I hear so many negative things about the media, but my experience for, for our brand is that the media have absolutely supported it.

Nathan Bush: So people are reading about it in

Rosa Willis: the newspaper and then they're coming to our website at another time or maybe after that, and they're now, that's the dopamine it's pumping through their brain and they're looking at these products. It's aspirational.

Nathan Bush: So don't lead with the cause and don't guilt people at the till. Sell them the product, solve their problem and let the good that they've done while doing that for themselves be peppered through and land as a bonus, not the big pitch. Now, once it's running, two things drive how much your customers actually get behind your charity or your giving program. It's whether they can see the impact and whether the cause fits your brand. Rowan found the charity a merchant chooses can move donation rates by a few percent and that a trusted brand like Harris Farm gets generosity month after month because their customers trust their judgment. This is also where the win, win, Win gets real. The community in need has to actually benefit and your customers need to see that they have made it happen. Homey's co founder Nick Pierce put the visibility side better than anyone else that we've had on the show.

Rosa Willis: So probably the biggest thing in terms of promoting our message and then the impact is just to be accountable to

Nathan Bush: our stakeholders, which is our customers. So that's probably the way in which

Rosa Willis: we view it, is that this is. You have enabled this to transpire.

Nathan Bush: So to make sure that that's felt as much as possible and they have access to that.

Rosa Willis: So that's, that's the, you know, the principle.

Nathan Bush: So pick a cause that actually aligns with your brand and your customer and then show the impact back to them because they're the ones who make it happen. Alignment plus visibility is what turns a giving feature into a real relationship. So here's what I'd leave you with. The link between giving and commercial benefit is real, even if it's a little uncomfortable to say out loud. Doing good isn't why you do it. You don't do good just to achieve great commercial results. But done properly, a great charity or giving partnership strengthens your brand, sets you apart and earns you a share of the market. It only works though, if there is a strong commercial case behind it, one that actually strengthens your brand positioning market, not just warm and fuzzy on its own purpose out front, a commercial backbone underneath, and a real win for the retailer, the charity and the community all at once. It's a beautiful thing when it happens. If you're weighing up whether a giving program actually stacks up for your store or which cause would actually fit brand, that's exactly the kind of thing retailers and brands are working through in the Add to Cart community every day. It's free to join. We'd love to have you in there. Head on over to add to cart.com to join up. That's the playbook for this week. I hope we got you thinking around ways that you can partner with some great charities or giving partners to help amplify that win, win, win. I'll see you next Friday. Marketplaces in Australia aren't just emerging or a nice side piece to DTC anymore. They're established, they're complex and they are moving fast. Amazon continues to accelerate. TikTok shop is looming and for most brands, managing a marketplace properly has become a full time job. Forecasting content, ads, logistics, compliance. It's a lot and it requires specialist knowledge. That's where pattern can help. Patton don't just advise on marketplaces. They actually buy your product and then sell it on global marketplaces as your partner. That means they have real skin in the game. They only win if you win. Simple as that. Through their Marketplace accelerator model, Patton handles everything from inventory forecasting and listing creation through to advertising, fulfillment and international expansion. So if marketplaces feel overwhelming or you know you should be doing more, but you just don't have the time, the team or the energy, contact pattern to help you make the most of the marketplace opportunity. Learn more@au.pattern.com.

Tagged

  • Brand and Storytelling
  • Sustainability and Ethics
  • Customer Experience and Retention
Add To Cart is brought to you by
Gold partners of Australia's ecommerce podcast
Primary episodes · Mondays and Wednesdays

Other episodes you might like

1,116 posts · people posting daily

In the community right now

Free to join. Ask the thing you can't ask your team, and get an answer from someone who's already solved it.

Join the community